Quote:
|
That might be a tenable line if it weren't for posts like this, where you do exactly what you claim to never do as a matter of policy/practical necessity/however you want to justify it. Oops. You defend your ideology until it becomes inconvenient, then you bring down the rule against discussing it.
|
The owner of this site had acknowledged a pro-animal rights bias. If others want to AGREE with that bias is one thing. *Debating* (meaning to present opposing views) is a different matter entirely. It's not a matter of the policy becoming "inconvenient" - it's a matter of taking it at it's word. That there is to be NO debating the merits of PETA or any other animal rights group here on this forum. No where have we stated that mentioning PETA, belonging to PETA, or stating an agreement with PETA (or any other animal rights organization) is forbidden. All that is frowned upon is the criticism and debate of such groups ... for the reasons I already gave you.
Shtinkpuppie: If you have any further disagreements, thoughts, feelings, or issues with this directive, please take it up directly with the site owner or one of the management.