Quote:
Originally Posted by momof2pigs  I am wrong in part. BUT bars can STILL sell alcohol in general. What happens to ONE bar owner for the actions of that bar and the resulting problems with said drunk person, doesn't a total prohibition on bars make. Does that make sense? |
This isn't about prohibition. To equate prohibition to pets you would have to believe that all pets should be destroyed and no one should be allowed to ever own an animal.
This is about controlling a cruel problem. Bars buy their alcohol from distilleries that create their product from grain. Petstores buy their animals from mill breeders and bunchers that horribly abuse their animals to churn out a profit.
You cannot bang two alcohol bottles together and create more booze but you an throw two opposite sex animals together and create more.
You cannot force a person to get drunk and drive but any moron can walk into a petstore to buy an animal.
It is impossible to in any way equate alcohol to animal abuse and overpopulation.
You would be better to equate it to human slave ownership. A slave owner can force 2 slaves to reproduce (to a degree), sell them and even abuse them but if you noticed the majority of the world outlawed slavery a long time ago.