[smartorl]

Wow, I came into this one very late. This is one of those unbelievable situations in my opinion. I don't know who I am madder at the pet store for overcrowding (I am sure just in case there is a Christmas rush on hammies) or the person who stood by and watched them kill another. If it were me, I would have a hard time sleeping after casually taping them painfully killing another. The eating part happens and should have been reported but doesn't upset me, it is the fact that at any time instead of filming, the fight could have been reported and the animal removed. This is one of those situations that actually gives "rescuers" a bad name to many. To stand by and tape it makes him actually worse than the pet store, he knew about it, they may or may not have. The rabid defense of a stupid situation further confirms to me that there was no excuse or defense of the husbands actions (how many times did the time frame and story change?) and it fact, it takes a pretty perverse person to stand by and watch something like that knowing that something could have been done at any time to prevent it.